| Background |
| The issue |
Land Information New Zealand publicly
advertised the ‘Ben Nevis’ and ‘Craigroy’
Pastoral lease tenure review proposals on Saturday 12 September and
called for submissions. These two Crown pastoral lease properties
occupy nearly 20,000 hectares of the Nevis Valley in the all important
middle flats area around Nevis Crossing. |
| Contact for further details |
Further information on each
proposal can be requested from.
Contact: David Paterson
Phone: +64 (03) 479-3653
Fax +64 (03) 474-0389
Email: david.paterson@darrochvaluations.co.nz
Fish and Game Otago are preparing and circulating
further advice to those planning to submit. See Save
the Nevis at the Fish and Game website. |
| What is "tenure review"? |
Tenure review, under the
Crown Pastoral Lands Act involves the reclassification of Crown
lease land into either Crown conservation land or freehold land
based on an assessment of ‘significant inherent values’
(recreational amenity, flora and fauna, landscapes etc) and recommendations
on how best to protect them.
The Act expresses a preference for retention
in Crown ownership as reserve land where there are ‘significant
inherent values’. |
| The proposal and the inherent problems |
The proposals for Ben Nevis
and Craigroy are based on retention by the Crown of just over 11,000
hectares of mostly high altitude land, to be managed for conservation
by DOC, and the transfer about 8000 hectares of mostly valley floor
on either side of the river as freehold land to be passed to Pioneer
Generation Limited. |
| Fish and Games opinion |
Fish and Game considers the
proposals are a very bad deal as far as the public are concerned
as the proposal helps facilitate industrial scale hydro development
in the all important heritage resource areas around Queenstown and
Cromwell. |
| The risk to the Nevis as a fishery |
The high altitude land on
the properties is not at obvious risk but the valley floor is at
clear risk from hydro development once tenure review is complete.
The proposals also perpetuate an imbalance in
tenure review outcomes throughout the South Island high country
that has seen large areas of high altitude land go into Crown reserves
but has neglected lower altitude areas with important conservation
and recreation and access values. |
| The problem with the current proposal |
Covenants are proposed to
protect significant inherent values on land earmarked for freeholding
but in these cases they are designed to be hollow shells and move
aside in the face of hydro development. In effect they offer no
protection at all to the most obvious threat. |
| Who are Pioneer Generation? |
Pioneer Generation Limited are a local Otago power
company owned by Central Lakes Trust. |
| What does Pioneer Generation want? |
They want freehold title to valley floor land
including a hydro dam footprint to advance their plans for a 40 megawatt
hydro dam involving two dams and the inundation of a large area of
river flats. |
| What is the cost of them achieving this? |
The area concerned provides
habitat for the nationally vulnerable Smeagol galaxias, a rare native
fish only found in the Nevis valley, as well as being part of the
historically important Nevis goldfield.
Hydro dams would also impact severely on the
nationally renowned trout
fishery, the catchment supports and on significant landscape
values. |
| The difference between this and the Kawarau Water
Conservation issue |
It is important
interested individuals and organisations don’t confuse these
tenure review proposals with Fish and Game’s application to
amend the Kawarau
Water Conservation Order.
While both processes deal with the
importance of natural and recreational values present in the valley,
the conservation order has a focus on water related values and the
tenure reviews focus on those natural and recreational values present
on the two leasehold properties. Of course both sets of values overlap
to a large degree but it is important to tailor submissions to fit
the different processes |
| Progress Report on Water Conservation Order Amendment |
The tribunal hearings on
the Fish and Game application to amend the water conservation order
and prohibit damming on the Nevis River reconvened in late August
2009.
Rebuttal evidence was presented by Fish and Game
along with closing legal submissions. The tribunal then adjourned
the hearing until February 2010 to allow preparation of further
evidence on indigenous flora and fauna in the valley. Evidence from
Forest and Bird and others at the original June hearings flagged
the possibility of outstanding botanical values on the valley floor
and in response the tribunal requested additional expert evidence
in that area. |
| In the news |
| 6 May 2009 |
Anglers
say Nevis valley tenure review flawed
The Press
Fish
and Game New Zealand is targeting the Government over what it
says is the misguided and runaway tenure review of a Central Otago
river valley.
Lands Minister Richard Worth can expect a letter
from the fishing and hunting advocacy group today outlining what
it says are flaws in the tenure review proposals for the Ben Nevis
and Craigroy stations beside the Nevis
River.
Fish and Game Otago and the Department of Conservation
are at odds over the future of the valley close to Lake
Wakatipu and between the Hector and Garvie mountains and over
a plan to flood part of it for hydro-power generation... |