| “An
insult to the integrity of the Waitaki
Allocation Plan”, is how Bryce Johnson, Chief Executive
of Fish & Game New Zealand describes Meridian Energy’s
latest proposals for the Waitaki
River.
“Meridian’s proposals for the North
Bank Tunnel and Hunter Downs Irrigation Scheme show brash contempt
for both the value of the Waitaki
River and the work completed only last year by the Waitaki Water
Allocation Board. The allocation plan was developed independently,
with a high level of regional input, and involved a huge quantity
of high quality information. It allocates water for various uses
including irrigation and hydro generation and well as sets environmental
flows.
“The consequences to the river of these
latest proposals are comparable to those of Project Aqua and even
more so with an additional 40-45 irrigation applications waiting
in the wings to be consider over the next few months. In addition
to Meridian’s dismissive approach toward the allocation plan,
their spokesperson would not deny encouraging other irrigation applicants
to apply for water takes that would reduce the river’s minimum
flow to 100 cumecs. This is two thirds of the minimum flow agreed
in the allocation plan!
“A more accurate representation of these
latest proposals would see Meridian’s disingenuous rata flower
shredded during its journey through the North Bank Tunnel, left
stranded in a dry side braid of the Waitaki or, pumped through a
centre-pivot irrigator to end as dairy effluent.
“It should not be left to not-for-profit
NGOs such as Fish & Game to defend the integrity of the Plan
and its minimum flows set during a thorough process established
in good faith by Government special legislation.
“To maintain integrity and public confidence,
the Government must make it unambiguously clear that Environment
Canterbury “owns” the Waitaki Catchment Water Allocation
Plan, and that Environment Canterbury has the responsibility to
defend the Plan’s minimum flow provisions and other habitat
and amenity value protection components in the Plan. Any other course
of action would be clear breach of integrity and trust.
|